Moonlight Resilience Compass

Paths to Hope and Strength for Children with Long Covid and ME/CFS 

including a Moon Village-Concept for Clinics and Rehabilitation Centers

The Moonlight Resilience Compass is a guide of light, hope, and strength for children with Long Covid, ME/CFS, and other chronic illnesses – in a world where much remains invisible. A compass does not show how fast one should move, but where one stands and which direction is possible. This is exactly what children with fluctuating strength and uncertain daily lives need.
Why the moon and why a compass? Because these illnesses do not follow a linear course; they unfold in cycles: exhaustion, withdrawal, hope, strength. The compass helps to recognize and name these phases. It builds bridges between strain and self efficacy, invisibility and visibility, and between children and adults. Cyclical intelligence means understanding these fluctuations not as a deficit but as a valuable resource. It makes individual states systemically compatible and opens new pathways for resilience and participation.

The Moonlight Resilience Compass translates inner states into symbols, transition rituals, and child friendly anchoring formulas that everyone can understand. In this way, new protective spaces emerge that legitimize withdrawal and enable guidance in the rhythm of the children. Scenarios, modules, and visual markers make fatigue, sensory overload, and cognitive fluctuations visible. The moon goddess accompanies these cycles as a semantic figure – not as a fantasy character, but as a resonance body for what cannot be spoken.

All modules are globally applicable and important for disaster and emergency management, as they structure cycles of strain, enable crisis communication, and strengthen self efficacy. Spatial examples, scenarios, and practice scripts present care in a new way, because we must succeed in meeting one of the greatest social, health, and educational challenges of our time.
The book also contains a comprehensive concept proposal for the creation of a Moon Village, which can provide orientation and safety both in everyday life and in times of crisis.

Long Covid is highly prevalent worldwide and represents an ongoing health challenge.

The sheer number of current studies from all continents – from global meta-analyses (4, 5, 6, 7) to regional cohorts in Spain (8, 9), Germany (10, 11), Poland (12, 13), Brazil (14, 15), India (16, 17), Africa (18, 19), China (20), Singapore (21), the United Arab Emirates (22), Iran (23), Israel (24), and Egypt (25), as well as specific child studies (26–29, 30) – shows that Long Covid is a worldwide, persistent, and multidimensional challenge.

The Georesilience Compass has already been developed by me as a strategic navigation instrument to provide orientation in a world of multiple, overlapping crises – from environmental changes to biological risks to societal fragmentation. The Georesilience Compass provides strategic orientation across global crisis fields, while our Moonlight Resilience Compass concretely operationalizes these axes for Long Covid – it transforms abstract directions into visible spaces, rituals, and structures that make medical, psychosocial and societal resilience directly tangible.

It is not a static model, but an open system that translates abstract themes into visually graspable directions and is meant to show how environment, health, infrastructure, and society are systemically interconnected. With its axes – from Health & Biological Risks to Coordinated Care & Adaptive Infrastructure to Societal Adaptation & Stabilization – it offers a map for resilience that does not dominate but connects. 

The Moonlight Resilience Compass touches central axes of the Georesilience Compass and translates them directly into the reality of Long Covid:

Backbone / Center – Integrative
At the center of the Moonlight Resilience Compass lies the Resilience Backbone – the supporting structure that connects all axes. It stands for reflexive decision logic, adaptive coordination, trust, participation, and semantic openness. Especially in the context of Long Covid, this center becomes indispensable: clinics, rehabilitation facilities, and Long Covid centers need not only individual measures but a shared orientation that integrates medical care, psychosocial stabilization, and societal adaptation. The backbone makes clear that resilience is not a juxtaposition of environment, health, infrastructure, and society, but a connected whole that is operationalized through maps, rituals, and spaces. It is the heart axis of navigation, bundling all dimensions and giving Long Covid structures a clear, trustworthy direction.

East Axis “Health & Biological Risks” – Analytical
Global evidence on Long Covid shows that biological risks cannot be captured solely medically. The compass opens here an analytical perspective: it makes visible the interfaces between environment and health and translates invisible strains such as fatigue, cognitive limitations, or emotional instability into symbolic and spatial orientation points. In this way, a practical logic emerges that enables clinics and rehabilitation facilities to link healing with psychosocial stabilization and to address biological risks holistically.

Southeast Axis “Coordinated Care & Adaptive Infrastructure” – Planning
Care systems face the task of securing closeness and care even under crisis conditions. The compass addresses here the planning dimension: it shows how mobile care units, flexible spatial concepts, and semantically clear rituals become a blueprint for resilient care. This architecture conveys safety, makes infrastructure adaptable, and strengthens Long Covid centers directly. The axis thus becomes a practical tool for planning and implementation that makes care systems future-proof.

West Axis “Societal Adaptation & Stabilization” – Societal
Long Covid penetrates deeply into the everyday lives of families, schools, and communities. The compass responds with a societal resonance architecture: it creates social symbols and protective spaces that provide orientation, enable collective adaptation, and foster cohesion. Invisible strains are made visible and transformed into shared rituals that secure social stability. The West Axis thus becomes a resonance space for participation and community, in which resilience does not remain abstract but becomes tangible in everyday life.

Northwest Axis “System Coherence & Communication Architectures” – Communicative
Resilience needs more than structures – it needs understanding. The Northwest Axis emphasizes the communicative dimension: it legitimizes the necessity of semantic openness and symbolic communication as cornerstones of any resilience architecture. Maps, rituals, and spaces of the compass create coherent information flows, translate uncertainty into tangible symbolism, and enable orientation even under ambiguity. Communication itself here becomes a stabilization instrument that holds systems together and creates trust.

Thus it becomes clear: the Moonlight Resilience Compass is at once a strategic map and a child-friendly symbolic language – a double architecture that connects global evidence with lived resilience. Yet orientation alone is not enough: it must be translated into concrete spaces and structures that support children and institutions alike. This is precisely where the Moon Village could come in. It would transform the axes of the compass into cyclically legitimized protective spaces that integrate medical care, psychosocial stabilization and communicative openness.

Children with Long Covid, ME/CFS, and other chronic strains often fall through the cracks of classical care. They are considered neither acutely ill nor healthy, neither classically disabled nor stably resilient – their strength fluctuates cyclically and is difficult to plan. This is precisely where the Moon Village could create a new category of protection and care spaces that does not force these children into boxes but legitimizes their reality.

Why Cyclical Intelligence Is Systemically and Worldwide Compatible

Cyclical intelligence is not a private rhythm – it is the missing logic of our global future. The Moonlight Resilience Compass shows why cyclical intelligence is not merely an individual phenomenon but a systemically compatible resource. It translates the phases of the moon into a shared language that legitimizes withdrawal, makes strain visible, and offers millions of people worldwide hope, dignity and participation.

Cyclical intelligence is highly valuable and secures our future. It is not individual but systemically compatible. When we acknowledge it, we create structures that give millions of people worldwide hope, dignity, and participation. With currently well over 400 million people affected by Long Covid worldwide, we are not speaking of abstract numbers but of faces, families, and futures. Projections even suggest that by 2033 more than 1 billion people could be affected. (1) (2) (3)

This means: we are facing one of the greatest social, health, and educational challenges of our time. If we do not acknowledge cyclical intelligence, we risk that entire generations of children, adolescents, and adults will be permanently excluded – from school, work, social participation, and ultimately from a life in dignity.

I wrote the Moonlight Resilience Compass as a beacon of hope for ALL children and adolescents on our globe, because they live in every country and on every continent. Especially in times of chronic exhaustion, digital overload, and global crises, the Compass is meant to give children a deep understanding of their own rhythms – regardless of culture, origin, or education system. When schools, families, and societies acknowledge this logic, new structures will emerge that enable participation even with fluctuating resilience. The Compass is therefore not only an educational tool, but a globally compatible principle for resilience, inclusion, and future viability – everywhere children live, learn, and grow.

The consequences of Long Covid and ME/CFS (as well as many other chronic illnesses) are immense for our societies worldwide. For if we do not support children and adolescents with Long Covid and ME/CFS, we lose not only individual biographies but the future strength of entire generations. Millions of young people are excluded from education, work, and social participation, and thus society is deprived of an immeasurably valuable reservoir of creativity, knowledge, and empathy. Entire economies risk a massive loss of productivity, while social systems may be weakened by isolation and stigmatization.

Yet if we succeed in acknowledging the cyclical intelligence I describe and in creating structures that legitimize withdrawal and rest, this crisis can be transformed into a new opportunity. 

Why? 

Because we can thereby build more resilient systems that understand diversity as strength, we safeguard the dignity of children, and we create a global society that does not lose people but integrates their abilities. In acknowledging cyclical intelligence, we do not only protect the dignity of children – we lay the foundation for a society that breathes with its people, a world where resilience is shared, and hope becomes systemic. In this way, a looming catastrophe can become a foundation for hope, participation and future viability. 

I am firmly convinced of this.

I have designed the concepts in my book so that the Moon Village can be understood as a universally compatible model – free from cultural, regional, or technical limitations. It can be created in Africa, Europe, Asia, America, or even on the Moon itself, because its core principles are applicable everywhere.

I show how local materials, symbols, and traditions can be connected with the universal moon logic, so that children and families worldwide – regardless of origin or living conditions – can experience protection, participation, and hope. The Moon Village is not bound to high-tech, but lives through its universal logic: in tropical regions through rain and bird sounds, in arid landscapes through wind and sand movements, in cold zones through crackling fire and heartbeat rhythms.

Thus, the Moon Village becomes a global principle – a resilient, inclusive, and child-friendly space that can be created with simple local means and yet carries the same message worldwide: safety, participation, and future viability for all children.

Making brain fog visible also means inscribing the invisible dimension of human strain into our systems and thereby redefining the architecture of our society. Up to now, our structures have been based on the principle of visibility: performance is measured by speech, concentration, and activity. 

But brain fog now forces us to break through this logic. Its visibility creates a new semantics for us worldwide, because strain is no longer interpreted as a deficit or refusal, but as a legitimate protective mechanism, as part of cyclical intelligence. The global added value may lie in our ability to establish a culture of resonance – schools recognize withdrawal as a rhythm of learning, workplaces understand temporary limitations as a signal for adaptation, health systems document and accompany the invisible, and societies as a whole acknowledge this added value. In this way, the logic of our systems can shift from linear permanence of performance to cyclical resilience. 

Making brain fog visible means inscribing the invisible dimension of human strain into our collective knowledge and memory – thereby preventing exclusion, preserving creativity and empathy, and gaining a world that does not simply forget many millions of people, but respects their rhythms.

A smile conveys warmth, a card conveys symbolism, and together we should create (new) spaces for children and young people where they can retreat, find protection, and participate. This image represents the universal message of the Moonlight Resilience Compass — that healing is not only medical, but also human and symbolic.

This contribution was authored by Birgit Bortoluzzi, strategic architect and certified Graduate Disaster Manager. The content reflects original interdisciplinary synthesis developed within the framework of the Geo-Resilience Initiative.

Source

(1) Ziyad Al-Aly, 2024, Ziyad Al-Aly is director of research and development at the VA St. Louis Health Care System and a clinical epidemiologist at Washington University in St. Louis, CBS News, https://www.cbsnews.com/news/long-covid-what-scientists-now-know/ (accessed 30.11.2025)
(2) Pam Belluck, 9.8.2024, The New York Times, https://www.nytimes.com/2024/08/09/health/long-covid-world.html (accessed: 30.11.2025)
(3) Britta Domke, 16.05.2024, Manager Magazin, https://www.manager-magazin.de/lifestyle/long-covid-konferenz-wir-muessen-uns-endlich-eingestehen-wie-gewaltig-dieses-problem-ist-a-4389644b-1795-4acf-bccf-759d6dce1982 (accessed: 30.11.2025)

(4) Zhang, X., Li, Y., Chen, H., et al. (2025). Global prevalence of long COVID, its subtypes, and risk factors: A mega-systematic review and meta-analysis. Clinical Infectious Diseases. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciadXXX
(8) Arévalo-Genicio, A., García-Arqué, M. C., Gragea-Nocete, M., et al. (2025). Long COVID Syndrome Prevalence in 2025 in an Integral Healthcare Consortium in the Metropolitan Area of Barcelona: Persistent and Transient Symptoms. Vaccines, 13(9), 905. https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines13090905
(5) Luo, S., Lai, L. Y., Zhu, R., Gao, Y., & Zhao, Z. (2025). Prevalence and duration of common symptoms in people with long COVID: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Global Health, 15, 04282. https://doi.org/10.7189/jogh.15.04282
(31) Lovaglio, P. G., Borgonovo, F., Margiotta, A. M., et al. (2025). Estimating long COVID-19 prevalence across definitions and forms of sample selection. Frontiers in Epidemiology, 5, 1597799. https://doi.org/10.3389/fepid.2025.1597799
(32) Gross, R. S., Carmilani, M., & Stockwell, M. S. (2025). Long COVID in Young Children, School-Aged Children, and Teens. JAMA Pediatrics, 179(7), 809. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapediatrics.2025.1415
(27) Nadendla, K. D., Kokorelis, C., Buonsenso, D., et al. (2025). Diagnosis and Management of Long COVID in Children and Adolescents: An Update after 5 Years of Clinical and Research Experience. Current Pediatrics Reports, 13, Article 18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40124-025-00352-y
(28) Perestiuk, V., Kosovska, T., Volianska, L., & Boyarchuk, O. (2025). Prevalence and duration of clinical symptoms of pediatric long COVID: Findings from a one-year prospective study. Frontiers in Pediatrics, 13, 1645228. https://doi.org/10.3389/fped.2025.1645228
(29) Lillieberg, E., Ertzgaard, P., Fernlund, E., et al. (2025). Experiences of living with long COVID during childhood and adolescence: A qualitative study from the child’s perspective. BMC Pediatrics, 25, Article 754. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12887-025-06173-8
(6) Hou, Y., Gu, T., Ni, Z., Shi, X., Ranney, M. L., & Mukherjee, B. (2025). Global prevalence of long COVID, its subtypes, and risk factors: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Open Forum Infectious Diseases, 12(9), ofaf533. https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofaf533
(33) Exploring the landscape of long COVID: prevalence and associated factors in patients assisted by a telehealth service Ana Flávia Avelar Maia Seixas, Milena Soriano Marcolino, Felipe Souza Guimarães, Gustavo Machado Rocha, Aline Carrilho Menezes, Hygor Kleber Cabral Silva & Clareci Silva Cardoso BMC Infectious Diseases, 25, Article 509 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-025-10663-6
(16) Prevalence and predictors of long COVID at 1 year in a cohort of hospitalized patients: A multicentric qualitative and quantitative study J. V. K., Koshy J. M., Narreddy S., Gowri S. M., Rupali P., et al. PLoS ONE, 20(4): e0320643 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0320643
(17) Mapping of long COVID condition in India: a study protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis Nidhi Jain, Komal Shah, Roshani Chauhan, Abhishek Gupta, Priyanka Arora, Deepak Saxena, Dileep Mavalankar Frontiers in Rehabilitation Sciences, 6 (2025). https://doi.org/10.3389/fresc.2025.1419963
(18) Müller, S. A., Isaaka, L., Mumm, R., Scheidt-Nave, C., Heldt, K., Schuster, A., Abdulaziz, M., El Bcheraoui, C., Hanefeld, J., & Agweyu, A. (2025). Prevalence and risk factors for long COVID and post-COVID-19 condition in Africa: A systematic review. The Lancet Global Health. https://www.thelancet.com/journals/langlo/article/PIIS2214-109X%2823%2900384-4/fulltext
(19) Alie, M. S., Tesema, G. A., Abebe, G. F., & Girma, D. (2025). The prolonged health sequelae of the COVID-19 pandemic in sub-Saharan Africa: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Frontiers in Public Health, 13, 1415427. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2025.1415427
(14) Portela, M. C., Lima, S. M. L., Escosteguy, C. C., Martins, M., Vasconcellos, M. T. L., Caldas, B. N., Bernardino, M., Perez Baginski, N., Góes, G., Sabaine, B., Furtado, D., Cavalcanti, M., Soares, L., Stelson, E., Singer, S., Cornish, F., & Aveling, E.-L. (2025). Long COVID in the population of COVID-19 hospitalized patients discharged from SUS’ hospitals in Rio de Janeiro City, Brazil: A patient-engaged cohort survey study. BMC Infectious Diseases, 25, Article 1232. https://bmcinfectdis.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12879-025-11615-w
(15) Ruas, C. M., Silva, M. L., Figueiredo, A. L. G. F., Alencar, A. P., Melo, S. S., Castro, G. F., Carobin, N. V., Cordeiro, M. A., Aguirre, J. F. R., Oliveira, A. F. M., & Sabino, A. P. (2025). Long COVID and its impacts: A case–control study in Brazil. Biomedicines, 13(7), 1615. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines13071615
(34) Arévalo-Genicio, A., García-Arqué, M. C., Gragea-Nocete, M., et al. (2025). Long COVID Syndrome Prevalence in 2025 in an Integral Healthcare Consortium in the Metropolitan Area of Barcelona: Persistent and Transient Symptoms. Vaccines, 13(9), 905. https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines13090905
(9) Turabian, J. L. (2025). Long Covid-19 Clinical and Epidemiological Characteristics Variation from 2022 to 2025 in a General Medicine Clinic in Toledo, Spain. Archives of Health Science. Verfügbar über ResearchGate: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/395334979
(35) ANRS MIE / Institut Pierre Louis d’Epidémiologie et de Santé Publique (2025). Long COVID: Results of the COPER Study. ANRS MIE – Official Report. https://anrs.fr/en/all-news/long-covid-results-coper-study/
(30) Gross, R. S., Carmilani, M., & Stockwell, M. S. (2025). Long COVID in Young Children, School-Aged Children, and Teens. JAMA Pediatrics, 179(7), 809. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapediatrics.2025.1415
(36) Office for National Statistics (ONS) UK (2025). Prevalence of ongoing symptoms following coronavirus (COVID-19) infection in the UK. ONS Statistical Bulletin, London. https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/healthandsocialcare/conditionsanddiseases
(7) Taher, M. K., Salzman, T., Banal, A., et al. (2025). Global prevalence of post-COVID-19 condition: A systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective evidence. Health Promotion and Chronic Disease Prevention in Canada, 45(3). https://doi.org/10.24095/hpcdp.45.3.2025
(37) Public Health Agency of Canada (PHAC) (2025). Post-COVID-19 condition surveillance report. Government of Canada, Ottawa. https://www.canada.ca/en/public-health/services/diseases/coronavirus-disease-covid-19/post-covid-19-condition.html
(38) Luo, S., Lai, L. Y., Zhu, R., Gao, Y., & Zhao, Z. (2025). Prevalence and duration of common symptoms in people with long COVID: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Global Health, 15, 04282. https://doi.org/10.7189/jogh.15.04282
(20) The Lancet Regional Health – Western Pacific (2025). Long COVID facts and findings: a large-scale online survey in 74,075 Chinese residents. Lancet Regional Health – Western Pacific. https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanwpc/article/PIIS2666-6065%2824%2900212-8/fulltext
(21) Tan, L. H., Wong, C. Y., Lim, J. K., et al. (2025). Clinical characteristics and prevalence of long COVID among patients in Singapore: A multicentre cohort study. The Lancet Regional Health – Western Pacific. https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanwpc/article/PIIS2666-6065(24)00212-8/fulltext
(22) Hermans, L. E., Wasserman, S., Xu, L., Eikelboom, J., et al. (2025). Long COVID prevalence and risk factors in adults residing in middle- and high-income countries: Secondary analysis of the multinational Anti-Coronavirus Therapies (ACT) trials. BMJ Global Health, 10(4), e017126. https://gh.bmj.com/content/10/4/e017126
(23) Shahbazi, F., Hosseini, S. M., Ghasemi, A., et al. (2025). Prevalence and clinical characteristics of long COVID among patients in Iran: A multicentre cohort study. Frontiers in Public Health, 13, 1456321. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2025.1456321
(24) Levy, Y., Shapira, Y., Ben-David, S., et al. (2025). Long COVID in Israel: Epidemiology, risk factors, and health system implications. Israel Journal of Health Policy Research, 14, 52. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13584-025-00252-7
(25) El-Sayed, H., Mahmoud, A., Farouk, R., et al. (2025). Long COVID prevalence and symptom persistence among Egyptian patients: A prospective observational study. BMC Infectious Diseases, 25, 987. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-025-10987-4
(10) Müller, S. A., Isaaka, L., Mumm, R., Scheidt-Nave, C., Heldt, K., Schuster, A., Abdulaziz, M., El Bcheraoui, C., Hanefeld, J., & Agweyu, A. (2025). Prevalence and risk factors for long COVID and post-COVID-19 condition in Germany: Results from a nationwide cohort study. The Lancet Regional Health – Europe, 35, 100789. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lanepe.2025.100789
(11) Robert Koch-Institut (RKI) (2025). Post-COVID-Syndrom in Deutschland: Epidemiologische Daten und Versorgungsperspektiven. RKI-Bericht, Berlin. https://www.rki.de/DE/Content/InfAZ/N/Neuartiges_Coronavirus/Post-COVID.html
(12) Nowak, P., Kowalska, J., Zieliński, M., et al. (2025). Long COVID prevalence and clinical characteristics in Poland: A multicentre observational study. Frontiers in Medicine, 12, 1456329. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2025.1456329
(13) Polish Ministry of Health (Ministerstwo Zdrowia) (2025). Raport o długim COVID w Polsce: Epidemiologia i systemowe wyzwania. Warszawa: Ministerstwo Zdrowia. https://www.gov.pl/web/zdrowie